Additionally, for Title VII purposes, the EEOC clarified that employees are not entitled to a religious exemption if it would pose an “undue hardship” on the business, including the risk of spread of COVID-19 to other employees or to the public. Moreover, the EEOC confirmed that under Title VII, employers need only consider exemptions for employees who raise religious objections to the COVID-19 vaccine where such objections are based on sincerely held religious beliefs, customs, or practices. In its update, the EEOC has confirmed that in the context of religious accommodation issues, Title VII applies to requests for religious accommodation, but does not require employers to grant merely social, political, economic or personal-preference based requests. On October 25, the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) updated its Technical Assistance document to provide employers guidance on considering religious exemptions to vaccine mandates under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Sincerely held moral or ethical beliefs about right or wrong having the strength of religious views are protected, but may not need to be religious based as traditionally viewed. Under Wisconsin law, “creed” is defined as “a system of religious beliefs, including moral or ethical beliefs about right and wrong, that are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views”. The Wisconsin Fair Employment Act requires consideration under its prohibition of discrimination on the basis of creed. While both the state Wisconsin Fair Employment Act (WFEA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 under federal law recognize religious exemptions, the consideration under each has some differences. In considering employee requests for an exemption from a vaccine mandate for religious reasons, employers need to consider the request under both state and federal law. In turn, employers are increasingly receiving requests from employees for exemptions from these mandatory vaccine policies for a wide variety of reasons, including medical, social, political, economic, and personal, as well as religious reasons. Public Services, Infrastructure, TransportationĮmployers nationwide are implementing mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies in light of the Septemannouncement of President Biden’s “Path Out of the Pandemic” COVID-19 Action Plan.No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. Health personnel immunisation programmes influenza vaccines mandatory programmes mass vaccination religious exemptions. Partnering with religious leaders and carefully correcting erroneous information may help address requestors' concerns. Less than 0.1% of employees requested religious exemptions. Individuals (n=6) also volunteered information supporting the sincerity of their beliefs including distress over previous vaccination and examples of behaviour consistent with their specific objection or their general religious commitment. Two individuals asserted that the vaccine contained cells derived from aborted human fetuses. The most frequently cited category (n=9) was purity the vaccine and/or its mode of administration were impure, or receiving the vaccine would make the individual impure.
Individuals articulated reasons in 1-5 (mean 2.6) categories. Content analysis identified six categories of reasons used to justify an exemption: risks/benefits, ethical/political, lack of direct patient contact, providence, purity and sanctity of life. All requestors voluntarily identified their religious affiliation, and most were Christian (n=9). Requestors included both clinical and non-clinical employees. Twelve of 15 260 (0.08%) employees submitted applications requesting religious exemptions. Some programmes permit religious exemptions, but little is known about who requests religious objections or why.Ĭontent analysis of applications for religious exemptions from influenza vaccination at a free-standing children's hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA during the 2014-2015 influenza season. Having failed to achieve adequate influenza vaccination rates among employees through voluntary programmes, healthcare organisations have adopted mandatory ones.